H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 2-2
Johan Kriek and Bill Scanlon are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1989 Memphis third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1989* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-1 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1980* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Johan Kriek | 7-6 4-6 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1980* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-2 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1979* | Little Rock | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bill Scanlon | (w/o) | Johan Kriek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |