H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Johan Kriek vs Bob Lutz H2H: 1-1

Johan Kriek and Bob Lutz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Bob Lutz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1983 Tampa final 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Johan Kriek
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Bob Lutz
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Kriek #15 6-2 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data May 1, 1983* F Tampa ATP 250 Carpet
Bob Lutz 6-3 6-1 Johan Kriek #33 Match data Aug 17, 1980* F Stowe ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14
Bob Lutz — — — 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johan Kriek Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0 1968 23–15 60.5% — 1,707 0 0
21 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1 1969 24–16 60.0% — 1,845 0 0
22 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1 1970 23–18 56.1% — 1,855 0 2
23 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4 1971 45–25 64.3% — 1,992 0 4
24 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7 1972 36–29 55.4% — 1,912 0 5
25 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,841 0 5
26 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12 1974 15–18 45.5% — 1,745 0 5
27 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13 1975 36–19 65.5% — 1,875 0 6
28 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13 1976 27–17 61.4% — 1,926 0 6
29 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14 1977 36–22 62.1% — 1,833 0 6
30 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14 1978 28–16 63.6% — 1,917 0 7
31 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14 1979 23–13 63.9% — 1,889 0 8
32 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14 1980 33–17 66.0% — 1,952 0 11
33 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14 1981 10–13 43.5% — 1,788 0 11
34 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14 1982 6–15 28.6% — 1,698 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1983 3–3 50.0% — 1,698 0 11
36 — — — — — — — 1984 3–1 75.0% — 1,740 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% — 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Johan Kriek Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 1970 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2% — 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Johan Kriek Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1977 1510 107.6 — — — — +46 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 1782 136.9 — — — — +25 -221 — 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) 108.1 +2.47 1968 1708 127.8 — — — — -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) — — -2.16
21 1979 1862 149.4 — — — — +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) 107.6 -2.15 1969 1846 130.9 — — — — -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) — — -1.31
22 1980 1972 159.2 — — — — +53 — -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) 103.0 -5.59 1970 1855 135.8 — — — — -25 — +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 1981 1955 142.9 — — — — -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) 112.6 +0.70 1971 1992 148.4 — — — — +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 1982 1962 157.3 — — — — +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) 105.1 -3.28 1972 1913 151.7 — — — — +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 1983 1953 150.2 — — — — +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) 108.5 -1.61 1973 1841 135.1 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 1984 1918 146.2 — — — — -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) 99.0 -1.32 1974 1745 137.0 — — — — +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 1985 1908 150.1 — — — — +32 — +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 105.2 -0.23 1975 1875 152.4 — — — — +83 -147 — 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 1986 1864 141.9 — — — — -4 -100 — 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) 102.1 -1.64 1976 1926 158.4 — — — — +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 1987 1735 137.6 — — — — +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) 101.6 +0.53 1977 1833 152.1 — — — — +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 1988 1787 141.9 — — — — +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 96.8 -1.26 1978 1917 150.2 — — — — +30 -70 — 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 1989 1701 126.3 — — — — +60 — +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) 100.0 -0.30 1979 1890 140.1 — — — — +29 — -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 1990 1683 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1980 1952 152.7 — — — — +46 — -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 — +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.64 1981 1789 132.9 — — — — +6 — — 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 1982 1698 127.1 — — — — +10 +75 — 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1698 117.4 — — — — +8 — — 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1740 119.9 — — — — +6 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 — -0.67
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1742 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.35
Career — 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17 — 2053 152.2 — — — — +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.