H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 2-1
Johan Kriek holds a 2–1 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1982 Memphis semifinal 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1982* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Johan Kriek | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-4 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1979* | Denver | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Buster C Mottram | 7-6 6-4 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Johan Kriek | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |