H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 1-0
Johan Kriek holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1986 Johannesburg third round 6-4 5-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1986* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-4 5-7 7-6 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |