H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Johan Kriek vs Danie Visser H2H: 4-1

Johan Kriek holds a 4–1 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1989 Newport quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Johan Kriek
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #129 6-3 6-2 Johan Kriek #39 Match data Jul 15, 1989* QF Newport ATP 250 Grass
Johan Kriek #22 7-6 6-7 7-5 Danie Visser #110 Match data Nov 22, 1986* QF South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Johan Kriek #14 3-6 6-0 7-6 Danie Visser #148 Match data Aug 15, 1985* R32 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard
Johan Kriek #14 6-4 6-0 Danie Visser #149 Match data Jul 27, 1985* QF Livingston ATP 250 Hard
Johan Kriek #15 3-6 7-5 6-1 Danie Visser Match data Nov 25, 1983* R16 South African Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johan Kriek Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,510 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14 — — — — — — —
31 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14 — — — — — — —
32 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14 — — — — — — —
33 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14 — — — — — — —
34 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Johan Kriek Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Johan Kriek Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1977 1510 107.6 — — — — +46 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1978 1782 136.9 — — — — +25 -221 — 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +2.47 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20
21 1979 1862 149.4 — — — — +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.15 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59
22 1980 1972 159.2 — — — — +53 — -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) — -5.59 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82
23 1981 1955 142.9 — — — — -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) — +0.70 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53
24 1982 1962 157.3 — — — — +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.28 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
25 1983 1953 150.2 — — — — +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.61 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15
26 1984 1918 146.2 — — — — -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.32 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16
27 1985 1908 150.1 — — — — +32 — +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.23 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79
28 1986 1864 141.9 — — — — -4 -100 — 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.64 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54
29 1987 1735 137.6 — — — — +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.53 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1988 1787 141.9 — — — — +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 1701 126.3 — — — — +60 — +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 1683 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 — +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.