H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Leif Shiras H2H: 2-1
Johan Kriek holds a 2–1 lead over Leif Shiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on clay, while Leif Shiras leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leif Shiras won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Leif Shiras | 7-6 6-2 6-2 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1984* | Livingston | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Johan Kriek | 7-6 7-6 | Leif Shiras | Match data |
| May 9, 1984* | Forest Hills Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Johan Kriek | 6-3 6-0 | Leif Shiras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Leif Shiras | #1,118 | #31 | 291 | 1,687 | 71 | 102 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Leif Shiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #123 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |