H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Mark Cox H2H: 2-0
Johan Kriek holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1980 Cincinnati second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1980* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-0 6-1 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1980* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Johan Kriek | 7-6 6-3 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |