H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-2
Paul Annacone holds a 2–0 lead over Johan Kriek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1985 Chicago fourth round 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1985* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Jul 4, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |