H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Johan Kriek vs Peter Carter H2H: 1-0

Johan Kriek holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Carter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1989 Australian Open round of 128 6-7 6-3 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Kriek #40 6-7 6-3 6-2 6-3 Peter Carter #292 Match data Jan 18, 1989* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14
Peter Carter #952 #173 19 1,517 4 17 19.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johan Kriek Peter Carter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,504 0 0
19 1977 1–2 33.3% 1,510 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #385 1,496 0 0
20 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #289 1,506 0 0
21 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1 1986 1–2 33.3% #256 1,512 0 0
22 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1 1987 0–4 0.0% #270 1,473 0 0
23 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4 1988 1–4 20.0% #291 1,459 0 0
24 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7 1989 0–2 0.0% #568 1,436 0 0
25 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10
26 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12
27 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13
28 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13
29 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14
30 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14
31 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14
32 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14
33 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14
34 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Johan Kriek Peter Carter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1986 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1988 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0%
27 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3%
28 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
29 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Johan Kriek Peter Carter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1505 105.3 +27 25.0% -1.63 1–0 1–1 -0.18
19 1977 1510 107.6 +46 42.9% -1.00 0–1 +0.02 1984 1497 99.6 0.0% -4.00 -0.06
20 1978 1782 136.9 +25 -221 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) +2.47 1985 1507 114.4 +44 33.3% -0.83 +0.10
21 1979 1862 149.4 +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) -2.15 1986 1513 118.9 +42 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0.00
22 1980 1972 159.2 +53 -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) -5.59 1987 1474 100.8 11.1% -2.44 0–1 0–1 +0.08
23 1981 1955 142.9 -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) +0.70 1988 1459 100.7 +46 30.8% -2.08 0–1 1–0 +0.21
24 1982 1962 157.3 +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) -3.28 1989 1437 102.7 16.7% -2.00 1–1 +0.14
25 1983 1953 150.2 +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) -1.61
26 1984 1918 146.2 -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) -1.32
27 1985 1908 150.1 +32 +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) -0.23
28 1986 1864 141.9 -4 -100 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) -1.64
29 1987 1735 137.6 +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) +0.53
30 1988 1787 141.9 +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) -1.26
31 1989 1701 126.3 +60 +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) -0.30
32 1990 1683 98.3 33.3% -2.00 0–1 -0.04
33 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) +0.64
34 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
Career 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17 1518 113.5 +44 +27 23.5% -1.82 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +1.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.