H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Johan Kriek vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-1

Johan Kriek and Tomas Smid are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on clay, while Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1985 Las Vegas semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Johan Kriek
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Kriek #17 6-4 6-3 Tomas Smid #13 Match data May 4, 1985* SF Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #21 6-2 6-3 Johan Kriek #13 Match data Feb 26, 1983* QF Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johan Kriek Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9
34 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Johan Kriek Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
34 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Johan Kriek Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1977 1510 107.6 — — — — +46 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 1782 136.9 — — — — +25 -221 — 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +2.47 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1979 1862 149.4 — — — — +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.15 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1980 1972 159.2 — — — — +53 — -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) — -5.59 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1981 1955 142.9 — — — — -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) — +0.70 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1982 1962 157.3 — — — — +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.28 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1983 1953 150.2 — — — — +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.61 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1984 1918 146.2 — — — — -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.32 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 1985 1908 150.1 — — — — +32 — +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.23 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 1986 1864 141.9 — — — — -4 -100 — 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.64 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 1987 1735 137.6 — — — — +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.53 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 1988 1787 141.9 — — — — +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.26 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 1989 1701 126.3 — — — — +60 — +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.30 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 1990 1683 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 — +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.64 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
34 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.