H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Van Winitsky H2H: 2-1
Johan Kriek holds a 2–1 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 2–0 on carpet, while Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1984 Montreal / Toronto third round 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1984* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Van Winitsky | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1982* | Munich-2 Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Johan Kriek | 6-3 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1979* | Sarasota | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Johan Kriek | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |