H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Bartlett vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 0-3
Ion Tiriac holds a 3–0 lead over John Bartlett in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1975 Jackson fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 78
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1975* | Jackson | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-4 | John Bartlett | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1973* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-4 | John Bartlett | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1973* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-7 6-1 6-3 | John Bartlett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Bartlett | #400 | #93 | 0 | 1,507 | 45 | 108 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Bartlett | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #118 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #210 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #175 | 1,367 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #221 | 1,332 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #268 | 1,324 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #400 | 1,337 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |