H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Damir Keretic H2H: 2-0

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1988 Philadelphia round of 32 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Damir Keretic
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #57 6-1 7-6 Damir Keretic #123 Match data Feb 25, 1988* R32 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet
John Fitzgerald 6-3 6-7 6-4 Damir Keretic Match data Mar 26, 1981* R32 Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,476 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1982 — — — — 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 1979 1496 100.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 1980 1477 97.2 — — — — +53 +20 — 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.39
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1981 1477 122.8 — — — — — +42 — 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.85
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1982 1618 125.5 — — — — — +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +2.82
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1983 1528 123.9 — — — — -63 +44 — 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 96.0 +0.53
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1984 1574 127.4 — — — — — +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.03
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1985 1596 124.5 — — — — — +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 +1.43
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1986 1688 134.4 — — — — -143 +52 — 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 111.3 -1.30
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1987 1694 139.5 — — — — -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 103.2 -1.52
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1988 1538 120.7 — — — — -47 +102 — 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.6 -0.37
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1989 1576 113.3 — — — — -37 — — 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1741 133.5 — — — — -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.