H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Dan Goldie H2H: 1-1

John Fitzgerald and Dan Goldie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on grass, while Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1991 Singapore round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dan Goldie
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dan Goldie #103 4-6 6-3 6-1 John Fitzgerald #219 Match data Apr 25, 1991* R32 Singapore ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
John Fitzgerald #102 7-5 7-5 Dan Goldie #113 Match data Jan 3, 1987* R16 Adelaide International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Dan Goldie #738 #27 457 1,855 122 117 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Dan Goldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1984 7–4 63.6% #101 1,615 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1985 3–9 25.0% #265 1,603 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1986 8–10 44.4% #113 1,658 0 0
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1987 24–19 55.8% #50 1,765 0 1
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1988 36–19 65.5% #29 1,800 0 2
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1989 12–14 46.2% #67 1,735 0 2
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1990 24–26 48.0% #96 1,658 0 2
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1991 8–15 34.8% #181 1,574 0 2
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Dan Goldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1987 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 79 69 148 53.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 19 16 35 54.3% 20 20 40 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Dan Goldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 1983 1494 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 1984 1616 132.0 — — — — -12 -15 — 59.3% +0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.33
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1985 1603 117.3 — — — — +16 -57 — 34.5% -0.90 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1986 1658 131.7 — — — — +38 -102 — 43.1% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -0.61
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1987 1765 144.5 — — — — -2 — -38 52.1% +0.15 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) 110.6 -2.01
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1988 1801 136.5 — — — — +24 — -130 57.8% +0.35 17–6 (74%) 10–6 (63%) 108.7 -0.07
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1989 1735 130.2 — — — — -17 -245 +91 47.8% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 100.2 -0.95
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1990 1658 132.5 — — — — +19 — +189 50.4% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 95.1 +1.16
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1991 1575 122.7 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +54 — +181 35.6% -0.95 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 99.4 -1.05
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1856 140.1 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +18 -98 +41 49.7% -0.08 53–37 (59%) 52–45 (54%) 107.4 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.