H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Danie Visser H2H: 2-0

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #146 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-2 Danie Visser #97 Match data Jun 27, 1986* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
John Fitzgerald #57 7-5 7-6 Danie Visser Match data Jul 7, 1983* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.