H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Danie Visser H2H: 2-0

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1986 Wimbledon second round 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 64 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass John Fitzgerald #146 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-2 Danie Visser #97 Match data
Jul 7, 1983* Newport ATP 250 R32 Grass John Fitzgerald #57 7-5 7-6 Danie Visser #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,482 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,505 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,620 0 0
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,651 0 0
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6 — — — — — — —