H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Fitzgerald vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 0-3
Eliot Teltscher holds a 3–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eliot Teltscher leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1987 Hong Kong final 6-7 3-6 6-1 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1987* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Eliot Teltscher | 6-7 3-6 6-1 6-2 7-5 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Sep 20, 1984* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eliot Teltscher | 6-2 6-4 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1983* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eliot Teltscher | 6-4 6-0 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Eliot Teltscher | #1,093 | #6 | 15 | 2,091 | 392 | 207 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Fitzgerald | Eliot Teltscher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #106 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 71–27 | 72.4% | #10 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,909 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,928 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #24 | 1,830 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #53 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #138 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |