H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Glenn Layendecker H2H: 2-1

John Fitzgerald holds a 2–1 lead over Glenn Layendecker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, John Fitzgerald leads 2–0 on grass, while Glenn Layendecker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 64 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Glenn Layendecker
USA Age 65 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #41 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 Glenn Layendecker #96 Match data Jun 30, 1989* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Glenn Layendecker #88 3-6 6-3 6-2 John Fitzgerald #99 Match data Apr 30, 1986* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
John Fitzgerald #43 7-6 6-7 6-4 Glenn Layendecker #167 Match data Dec 20, 1984* R32 Adelaide International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Glenn Layendecker #804 #48 447 1,733 77 104 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Glenn Layendecker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1984 3–12 20.0% #174 1,468 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1985 10–11 47.6% #118 1,526 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1986 17–17 50.0% #73 1,663 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1987 1–12 7.7% #353 1,517 0 0
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1988 9–8 52.9% #78 1,610 0 0
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1989 17–18 48.6% #87 1,651 0 0
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1990 12–14 46.2% #134 1,629 0 0
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 1991 6–8 42.9% #135 1,611 0 0
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 1992 2–4 33.3% #353 1,598 0 0
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Glenn Layendecker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1988 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1991 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 41 50 91 45.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 14 21 35 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Glenn Layendecker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.73 1984 1468 117.4 — — — — +88 — +2 25.0% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.05
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) — -2.02 1985 1526 116.1 — — — — +13 — +50 50.0% -0.13 3–5 (38%) 7–7 (50%) — +2.41
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) — +0.24 1986 1664 134.7 — — — — -1 -153 -70 45.3% -0.41 10–3 (77%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.17
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.81 1987 1517 108.0 — — — — +52 — +20 20.6% -1.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) — +2.51 1988 1610 128.7 — — — — +51 — -89 52.3% +0.14 3–3 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.57
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.14 1989 1651 126.2 — — — — -12 — -31 49.5% -0.04 7–8 (47%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.49
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.41 1990 1630 128.5 — — — — -1 — -3 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.62
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 1991 1611 117.0 -0.90 -2.45 0.858 47.3% +27 — -6 42.2% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.59
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.09 1992 1598 117.5 +1.00 -1.30 0.906 48.7% +32 — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.21
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1733 131.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.873 47.7% +17 -153 -16 43.8% -0.44 33–32 (51%) 42–40 (51%) 105.2 +1.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.