H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Jim Osborne H2H: 1-0

John Fitzgerald holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1982 Maui round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald 6-4 6-1 Jim Osborne Match data Sep 30, 1982* R32 Maui ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Jim Osborne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Jim Osborne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Jim Osborne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.15
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.