H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 0-1

Joakim Nystrom holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 128 7-6 6-0 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Joakim Nystrom
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joakim Nystrom #34 7-6 6-0 4-6 7-6 John Fitzgerald #38 Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Joakim Nystrom #977 #7 54 2,121 257 136 65.4% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Joakim Nystrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% #440 1,492 0 0
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 1981 13–12 52.0% #69 1,645 0 0
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1982 9–14 39.1% #98 1,617 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1983 26–12 68.4% #27 1,867 0 1
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1984 56–20 73.7% #11 1,969 0 5
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1985 50–21 70.4% #11 1,943 0 7
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1986 55–17 76.4% #7 1,926 0 12
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1987 33–16 67.3% #16 1,879 0 13
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1988 13–15 46.4% #69 1,730 0 13
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1989 2–8 20.0% #331 1,607 0 13
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Joakim Nystrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1984 20 4 24 83.3% 30 10 40 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 14 6 20 70.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1986 15 3 18 83.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 60 31 91 65.9% 138 70 208 66.3% 23 12 35 65.7% 36 23 59 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Joakim Nystrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1492 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 1981 1645 133.9 — — — — -78 +23 -103 46.8% -0.24 5–1 (83%) 0–5 (0%) 104.2 -0.49
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 1982 1618 133.1 — — — — -103 +115 — 43.5% -0.32 2–4 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.7 -0.22
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 1983 1868 149.9 — — — — -235 -70 -111 63.6% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.2 +0.17
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1984 1969 153.9 — — — — -39 -15 -234 65.1% +0.98 19–4 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 115.0 -0.15
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1985 1943 156.7 — — — — +8 +26 -150 65.8% +1.19 12–9 (57%) 12–5 (71%) 100.2 +0.33
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1986 1926 163.8 — — — — +108 +4 -113 70.2% +1.58 13–7 (65%) 11–5 (69%) 103.2 -0.15
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1987 1880 153.1 — — — — -25 +138 -78 62.8% +0.97 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) 103.3 -0.40
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1988 1730 133.0 — — — — +3 +142 +66 47.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 3–6 (33%) 94.9 -1.25
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1989 1608 95.3 — — — — +49 +152 — 30.8% -1.92 1–3 (25%) — — +0.53
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 2121 156.2 — — — — +2 +44 -117 60.9% +0.82 76–41 (65%) 57–41 (58%) 108.6 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.