H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Matt Mitchell H2H: 1-2

Matt Mitchell holds a 2–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matt Mitchell leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Matt Mitchell won the 1985 Miami Open round of 128 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Matt Mitchell
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matt Mitchell #63 6-4 3-6 6-4 John Fitzgerald #28 Match data Feb 5, 1985* R128 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Matt Mitchell #79 6-3 6-7 7-6 John Fitzgerald Match data Oct 14, 1982* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
John Fitzgerald 7-6 6-3 Matt Mitchell Match data Oct 1, 1982* R16 Maui ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Matt Mitchell #920 #53 0 1,718 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Matt Mitchell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1977 4–7 36.4% #220 1,510 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1978 0–2 0.0% #220 1,490 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1979 9–17 34.6% #106 1,531 0 0
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1980 5–13 27.8% #239 1,502 0 0
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1981 2–4 33.3% — 1,474 0 0
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1982 10–11 47.6% #96 1,546 0 0
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1983 9–14 39.1% #85 1,535 0 0
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1984 13–13 50.0% #55 1,661 0 1
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1985 8–20 28.6% #176 1,511 0 1
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1986 0–1 0.0% #799 1,502 0 1
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Matt Mitchell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1979 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1980 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 21 39 60 35.0% 5 14 19 26.3% 17 27 44 38.6% 17 23 40 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Matt Mitchell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.18 1976 1483 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.09
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.46 1977 1510 125.7 — — — — — +22 +48 46.4% -0.54 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.19
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.60 1978 1491 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.06
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.37 1979 1532 118.4 — — — — -53 — +85 35.6% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.34
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.73 1980 1502 108.7 — — — — -42 — — 32.6% -1.61 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.52
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) — -2.02 1981 1475 109.0 — — — — +13 — — 46.2% +0.08 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.97
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) — +0.24 1982 1546 124.2 — — — — +72 — -73 49.1% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) — +1.80
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.81 1983 1535 120.5 — — — — +82 — -46 41.1% -0.68 1–4 (20%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.58
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) — +2.51 1984 1661 123.3 — — — — +41 — -143 45.7% -0.50 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.18
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.14 1985 1511 115.7 — — — — +78 -33 -40 33.3% -1.11 4–7 (36%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.43
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.41 1986 1503 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1719 124.1 — — — — +31 +2 -31 39.7% -0.80 18–31 (37%) 25–28 (47%) 95.4 +5.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.