H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-2

Paul Annacone holds a 2–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1987 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-2 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #40 6-2 6-7 6-3 John Fitzgerald #190 Match data Aug 20, 1987* R32 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Paul Annacone #38 6-2 6-3 John Fitzgerald #95 Match data Oct 30, 1986* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Paul Annacone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Paul Annacone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Paul Annacone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 +1.07
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 103.3 +0.74
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) 112.6 +0.51
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -1.82
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) 98.8 -3.01
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) 97.2 -0.06
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) 91.3 -0.38
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) 91.3 -0.79
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 94.9 -0.03
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.