H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
John Fitzgerald vs Raul Antonio Viver H2H: 0-1
Raul Antonio Viver holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raul Antonio Viver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raul Antonio Viver won the 1985 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-4 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 5-7 6-4 6-2 6-1 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Fitzgerald | Raul Antonio Viver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |