H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-3

Roscoe Tanner holds a 3–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1983 Dallas fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 1983* Dallas ATP 250 R16 Hard John Fitzgerald #37 6-1 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #38 Match data
Oct 17, 1981* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 SF Hard Roscoe Tanner #9 6-2 6-3 John Fitzgerald #58 Match data
Jun 17, 1981* Bristol ATP 250 R16 Grass Roscoe Tanner #8 4-6 6-4 6-4 John Fitzgerald #81 Match data
Jun 27, 1980* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Roscoe Tanner #8 6-1 3-6 6-3 7-6 John Fitzgerald #305 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,158 595 298 66.6% 1 1 0 0 15 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,417 0 0
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,703 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,911 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,812 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4 1974 66–28 70.2% #14 1,959 0 2
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5 1975 65–24 73.0% #9 1,965 0 5
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,012 0 9
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1977 52–30 63.4% #15 1,880 1 11
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1978 59–24 71.1% #11 1,935 1 13
27 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,025 1 15
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,993 1 16
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,901 1 17
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,779 1 17
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,872 1 17
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,679 1 17
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,661 1 17
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6 — — — — — — —