H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-3

Roscoe Tanner holds a 3–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1983 Dallas round of 16 6-1 6-4.

AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #37 6-1 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #38 Match data Sep 16, 1983* R16 Dallas ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #9 6-2 6-3 John Fitzgerald #58 Match data Oct 17, 1981* SF Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #8 4-6 6-4 6-4 John Fitzgerald #81 Match data Jun 17, 1981* R16 Bristol ATP 250 Grass
Roscoe Tanner #8 6-1 3-6 6-3 7-6 John Fitzgerald Match data Jun 27, 1980* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 0
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% 1,416 0 0
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% 1,706 0 0
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1972 29–14 67.4% 1,910 0 0
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1979 1 4 5 20.0% 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 28.6% -1.14 0–1 -0.17
18 1979 1471 103.0 +9 23.1% -1.46 1–2 (33%) +0.26 1970 1417 113.2 +103 +73 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.50
19 1980 1524 126.5 +8 +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) +0.18 1971 1706 127.5 -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) -0.17
20 1981 1674 141.9 -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) +0.46 1972 1910 135.7 -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) -0.27
21 1982 1697 134.5 +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) +1.60 1973 1838 144.5 +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) -3.40
22 1983 1791 137.8 +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) +0.37 1974 1963 154.0 -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) -2.27
23 1984 1787 132.5 -28 +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) +1.73 1975 1972 153.3 +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) -0.74
24 1985 1667 139.5 +50 +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) -2.02 1976 2018 159.4 +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) -2.11
25 1986 1655 121.0 +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) +0.24 1977 1890 153.2 -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) -0.49
26 1987 1680 134.1 +18 +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) +0.81 1978 1941 160.3 +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) -1.59
27 1988 1768 135.8 -4 +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) +2.51 1979 2032 164.1 +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) -3.91
28 1989 1649 123.1 -39 +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) +1.14 1980 1997 154.8 +23 +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) -1.79
29 1990 1587 122.0 +24 +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) -0.41 1981 1926 156.1 +117 +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) -0.51
30 1991 1610 118.4 -28 +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 -0.77 1982 1786 138.8 +4 +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) -2.07
31 1992 1619 124.3 +19 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) +0.09 1983 1874 146.4 -44 +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) -4.29
32 1993 1583 106.1 +30 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.97 1984 1681 120.1 -28 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) -0.69
33 1994 1577 99.1 0.0% -3.67 -0.23 1985 1662 99.2 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 +0.08
34 1995 1571 104.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.21
Career 1859 138.8 +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 2162 157.4 +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.