H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Shlomo Glickstein H2H: 0-2

Shlomo Glickstein holds a 2–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shlomo Glickstein leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shlomo Glickstein won the 1982 Indian Wells Open round of 64 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Shlomo Glickstein
ISR Age 68 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shlomo Glickstein #32 2-6 6-1 6-4 John Fitzgerald #71 Match data Feb 17, 1982* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard
Shlomo Glickstein #66 6-3 6-0 John Fitzgerald #100 Match data Mar 20, 1981* R16 Nancy ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Shlomo Glickstein #1,013 #22 0 1,864 159 147 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Shlomo Glickstein
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1979 4–5 44.4% #204 1,516 0 0
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 1980 37–29 56.1% #65 1,785 0 1
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 1981 42–24 63.6% #34 1,830 0 2
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 1982 30–22 57.7% #33 1,746 0 2
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1983 20–21 48.8% #42 1,708 0 2
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1984 17–20 45.9% #81 1,652 0 2
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 1985 7–16 30.4% #167 1,600 0 2
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 1986 2–8 20.0% #284 1,529 0 2
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 1987 0–2 0.0% #797 1,503 0 2
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Shlomo Glickstein
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1980 18 9 27 66.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1981 22 11 33 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 19 9 28 67.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 10 8 18 55.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 79 59 138 57.2% 45 39 84 53.6% 18 19 37 48.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Shlomo Glickstein
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 1979 1517 116.8 — — — — +39 — +23 53.6% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 99.8 +1.13
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 1980 1785 144.2 — — — — +6 -193 -101 54.7% +0.34 9–9 (50%) 9–11 (45%) 101.7 +2.04
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1981 1831 139.7 — — — — +19 -102 -112 61.3% +0.49 11–8 (58%) 15–5 (75%) 106.8 +2.35
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1982 1747 137.7 — — — — +32 -22 — 55.6% +0.45 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 92.3 +2.42
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1983 1709 139.8 — — — — +4 +66 — 48.1% -0.30 7–6 (54%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 -0.53
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1984 1653 135.4 — — — — +50 +90 — 43.8% -0.46 10–5 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 104.2 -1.47
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1985 1601 120.5 — — — — +23 +48 +48 39.1% -1.05 2–4 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 100.4 -1.06
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1986 1530 103.9 — — — — +16 — — 29.6% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.71
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1987 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.21
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 1865 141.1 — — — — +22 -36 -60 51.6% +0.01 50–51 (50%) 55–52 (51%) 101.5 +1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.