H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 0-2

Tim Gullikson holds a 2–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Gullikson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Gullikson won the 1982 Bristol round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Tim Gullikson
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Gullikson 6-4 6-4 John Fitzgerald #73 Match data Jun 17, 1982* R32 Bristol ATP 250 Grass
Tim Gullikson 7-5 7-6 John Fitzgerald #65 Match data Apr 15, 1982* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Tim Gullikson — — — 2,012 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% — 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73 1975 1526 110.0 — — — — +36 — — 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.56
24 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02 1976 1587 121.0 — — — — -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.27
25 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24 1977 1869 146.4 — — — — -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
26 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81 1978 1956 150.8 — — — — +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
27 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51 1979 1983 152.5 — — — — +53 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
28 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14 1980 1880 148.3 — — — — +25 — +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
29 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41 1981 1868 150.9 — — — — +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
30 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77 1982 1729 145.3 — — — — +53 — +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
31 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09 1983 1759 134.2 — — — — +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
32 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97 1984 1613 132.9 — — — — +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
33 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23 1985 1585 121.6 — — — — +9 — +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
34 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21 1986 1583 108.2 — — — — -10 — — 22.2% -1.89 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.44
Career — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 — 2013 149.8 — — — — +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.