H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Fitzgerald vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-1
Tomas Smid holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Australian Open fourth round 7-5 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1983* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tomas Smid | 7-5 3-6 6-4 6-2 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Fitzgerald | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |