H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

John Fitzgerald vs Ulf Stenlund H2H: 0-1

Ulf Stenlund holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ulf Stenlund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ulf Stenlund won the 1987 Stockholm Open round of 64 3-6 7-5 6-4.

AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ulf Stenlund #50 3-6 7-5 6-4 John Fitzgerald #68 Match data Nov 4, 1987* R64 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Ulf Stenlund #901 #23 153 1,813 52 44 54.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Fitzgerald Ulf Stenlund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0
19 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0 1986 20–12 62.5% #34 1,697 0 1
20 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1 1987 24–19 55.8% #43 1,681 0 1
21 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2 1988 6–11 35.3% #246 1,616 0 1
22 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4
23 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5
24 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5
25 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5 1992 0–1 0.0% #301 1,605 0 1
26 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5 1993 2–1 66.7% #312 1,635 0 1
27 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6
28 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6
29 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6
32 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6
33 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6
34 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Fitzgerald Ulf Stenlund
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1979 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
28 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 41 29 70 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Fitzgerald Ulf Stenlund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1979 1471 103.0 +9 23.1% -1.46 1–2 (33%) +0.26
19 1980 1524 126.5 +8 +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) +0.18 1986 1698 135.3 -187 +80 60.0% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) +1.34
20 1981 1674 141.9 -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) +0.46 1987 1682 138.6 -54 +27 53.4% +0.38 10–9 (53%) 7–10 (41%) +0.31
21 1982 1697 134.5 +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) +1.60 1988 1617 127.1 +50 40.9% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) -1.15
22 1983 1791 137.8 +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) +0.37
23 1984 1787 132.5 -28 +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) +1.73
24 1985 1667 139.5 +50 +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) -2.02
25 1986 1655 121.0 +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) +0.24 1992 1606 104.7 +0.66 -3.36 0.818 45.9% 0.0% -2.00 0.00
26 1987 1680 134.1 +18 +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) +0.81 1993 1636 115.1 -1.60 +2.39 1.018 50.8% +65 66.7% +1.50 +0.18
27 1988 1768 135.8 -4 +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) +2.51
28 1989 1649 123.1 -39 +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) +1.14
29 1990 1587 122.0 +24 +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) -0.41
30 1991 1610 118.4 -28 +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 -0.77
31 1992 1619 124.3 +19 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) +0.09
32 1993 1583 106.1 +30 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.97
33 1994 1577 99.1 0.0% -3.67 -0.23
34 1995 1571 104.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.21
Career 1859 138.8 +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49 1813 138.5 -1.04 +0.95 0.966 49.6% -87 +53 53.3% +0.24 18–18 (50%) 11–14 (44%) 101.1 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.