H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

John Isner vs Andy Roddick H2H: 2-4

Andy Roddick holds a 4–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2012 Atlanta semifinal 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Andy Roddick
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andy Roddick #27 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 John Isner #11 Match data Jul 21, 2012* SF Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
John Isner #28 7-6(7) 6-4 Andy Roddick #21 Match data Aug 26, 2011* SF Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Andy Roddick #8 7-5 6-2 John Isner #33 Match data Mar 15, 2011* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
John Isner #55 7-6(3) 6-3 3-6 5-7 7-6(5) Andy Roddick #5 Match data Sep 6, 2009* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andy Roddick #5 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 John Isner #80 Match data Aug 8, 2009* SF Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Andy Roddick #5 6-4 7-6(4) John Isner #416 Match data Aug 5, 2007* F Washington Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,175 580 198 74.6% 1 5 0 5 21 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,854 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,922 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,091 1 11
21 — — — — — — — 2004 68–16 81.0% #2 2,068 1 15
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,036 1 20
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 2,008 1 21
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,007 1 26
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,045 1 27
27 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,990 1 29
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,025 1 30
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9 2012 23–13 63.9% #39 1,990 1 32
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10 — — — — — — —
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Isner Andy Roddick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 20 10 30 66.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 32 11 43 74.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 44 10 54 81.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 51 11 62 82.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 29 9 38 76.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2006 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2007 36 11 47 76.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 38 12 50 76.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2009 33 11 44 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2010 42 15 57 73.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 27 11 38 71.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
30 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1% — — — — — 407 137 544 74.8% 67 29 96 69.8% 83 22 105 79.0% 23 10 33 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 756/764 of John Isner's and 752/778 of Andy Roddick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age John Isner Andy Roddick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 7/9 7.4 2.1 56.8% 76.4% 57.4% 61.0% 37.5% 68.5% 33.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 50/55 10.4 3.6 58.9% 80.0% 57.0% 66.5% 37.5% 70.3% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 62/70 9.0 2.6 61.4% 79.8% 54.3% 64.2% 43.5% 70.0% 37.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 87/89 11.1 2.1 61.8% 80.6% 58.7% 63.1% 44.2% 72.2% 37.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 81/84 12.6 2.3 63.6% 81.2% 56.9% 69.8% 42.3% 72.3% 38.0%
22 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6% 2005 69/70 13.2 1.9 65.7% 82.6% 58.1% 70.6% 44.9% 74.1% 36.7%
23 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4% 2006 62/63 11.4 1.5 66.8% 79.9% 56.0% 70.1% 46.0% 71.9% 38.3%
24 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0% 2007 64/64 11.7 1.5 64.3% 80.8% 57.2% 65.2% 42.0% 72.4% 34.1%
25 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9% 2008 62/63 14.3 2.1 67.2% 78.4% 56.0% 65.8% 39.5% 71.1% 36.0%
26 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5% 2009 61/62 12.5 1.4 69.8% 79.4% 58.6% 61.6% 40.3% 73.0% 36.4%
27 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1% 2010 66/66 12.3 1.5 68.7% 79.6% 59.2% 67.2% 37.4% 73.0% 35.2%
28 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1% 2011 47/47 12.1 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 56.5% 62.5% 44.0% 69.7% 36.3%
29 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2% 2012 34/36 10.1 1.9 66.4% 75.8% 56.1% 64.8% 37.1% 69.2% 35.1%
30 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8% — 752/778 11.8 2.0 64.8% 79.8% 57.2% 66.1% 41.8% 71.8% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Isner Andy Roddick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1562 130.0 +2.92 -1.89 1.051 50.8% +7 — — 42.9% -0.29 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1854 151.7 +6.98 -0.04 1.246 53.2% -50 -84 -182 70.6% +1.13 7–8 (47%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1922 150.3 +6.65 +0.05 1.243 53.3% -11 -76 -241 67.9% +1.02 11–3 (79%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.39
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2091 158.5 +9.31 +1.00 1.343 54.4% -9 -246 -131 73.2% +1.35 17–5 (77%) 35–20 (64%) — -0.15
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2068 162.3 +8.68 +2.20 1.370 54.4% +33 -249 +34 76.8% +1.43 11–6 (65%) 35–10 (78%) — -0.37
22 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01 2005 2037 158.9 +9.75 +0.54 1.415 54.5% +35 -205 +243 73.3% +1.41 15–6 (71%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.17
23 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16 2006 2009 154.0 +8.35 +1.30 1.362 54.5% +43 -198 +195 70.4% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 16–17 (48%) — +3.03
24 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93 2007 2010 157.9 +8.22 -1.05 1.237 53.0% +51 -248 +218 70.9% +1.07 7–2 (78%) 29–12 (71%) — +1.00
25 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28 2008 2007 161.4 +7.15 +0.61 1.248 53.2% +42 -189 +148 69.0% +1.19 14–7 (67%) 23–17 (58%) — +0.50
26 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83 2009 2045 166.9 +8.85 +1.67 1.350 54.2% +9 -178 +250 72.2% +1.21 8–7 (53%) 32–11 (74%) — -0.24
27 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35 2010 1991 164.1 +8.60 +0.23 1.305 53.4% +45 -129 +236 67.5% +0.97 11–7 (61%) 23–17 (58%) — +2.84
28 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48 2011 2025 162.2 +5.97 +0.87 1.200 52.6% +41 — +182 63.9% +0.83 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.24
29 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24 2012 1991 148.1 +4.71 -0.49 1.139 52.1% +25 — +178 60.7% +0.44 7–3 (70%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.02
30 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58 — 2176 164.1 +7.98 +0.64 1.296 53.7% +22 -172 +108 70.1% +1.15 127–64 (66%) 280–166 (63%) 109.2 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.