H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

John Isner vs David Ferrer H2H: 2-6

David Ferrer holds a 6–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 5–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2016 Paris Masters third round 7-6(4) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard John Isner #27 7-6(4) 7-6(4) David Ferrer #16 Match data
Jan 26, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard David Ferrer #8 6-4 6-4 7-5 John Isner #11 Match data
Nov 7, 2015* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard David Ferrer #8 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 John Isner #13 Match data
May 9, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-4 John Isner #10 Match data
Nov 12, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard John Isner #25 6-3 3-6 6-3 David Ferrer #5 Match data
Mar 28, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #12 6-3 3-6 6-2 John Isner #134 Match data
Aug 22, 2007* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #15 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 John Isner #199 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #15 7-6(3) 6-3 John Isner #192 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —