H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
John Isner vs Dominik Hrbaty H2H: 0-1
Dominik Hrbaty holds a 1–0 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2009 Australian Open first round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 7-5 | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Dominik Hrbaty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |