H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
John Isner vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 2-0
John Isner holds a 2–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2016 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2012* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Fabio Fognini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 |