H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 2-1

John Isner holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2022 Acapulco third round 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2022* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Hard John Isner #23 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #152 Match data
Mar 13, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard John Isner #13 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #33 Match data
Sep 8, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 John Isner #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7