H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

John Isner vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 3-1

John Isner holds a 3–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2019 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Isner #14 6-3 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #165 Match data Aug 28, 2019* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
John Isner #21 7-5 7-6(8) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 Match data May 7, 2013* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
John Isner #33 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #43 Match data Jan 13, 2010* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #75 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(11) John Isner #106 Match data Feb 23, 2008* QF San Jose International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Isner Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 2007 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
27 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 2019 24 16 40 60.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
35 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
36 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
37 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
38 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1% 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 756/764 of John Isner's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age John Isner Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 —/— 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 —/— 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7% 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7% 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8% 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8% 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4% 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
37 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7% —/—
38 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0% —/—
Career 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8% 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Isner Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% 0.0% -2.00 -0.27
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 -0.99
22 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) 108.8 +0.01 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) 97.5 +0.16 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) 114.1 +0.93 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) 113.7 +2.28 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) 108.0 +1.83 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) 108.6 +3.35 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) 110.0 +3.48 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) 109.5 +3.24 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) 107.2 +3.80 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) 96.2 +1.41 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) 105.1 +3.24 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) 99.3 +2.48 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) 101.2 +3.19 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) 101.8 +1.74 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) 108.3 +0.90 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) 102.6 +1.11 2020 1608 102.1
38 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) 90.1 +1.74 2021 1586 97.2
Career 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.