H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 5-0

John Isner holds a 5–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2014 Wimbledon second round 7-6(17) 7-6(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass John Isner #11 7-6(17) 7-6(3) 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #62 Match data
Aug 30, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard John Isner #10 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #42 Match data
Aug 25, 2011* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #28 7-6(4) 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #50 Match data
Feb 19, 2010* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #25 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #126 Match data
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard John Isner #184 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —