H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
John Isner vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 9-4
John Isner holds a 9–4 lead over Kevin Anderson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 8–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2022 Dallas fourth round 7-6(1) 6-7(7) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
9
–
4
13 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2022* | Dallas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(1) 6-7(7) 7-6(5) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-7(9) 6-4 26-24 | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 6-4 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2013* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | F | Hard | John Isner | 6-7(3) 7-6(2) 7-6(2) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2013* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | John Isner | 6-2 7-6(1) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(3) 6-7(8) 7-6(7) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2012* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-5 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 30, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 6-3 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2010* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 7-5 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2008* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | John Isner | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2008* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(2) 7-5 | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |