H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

John Isner vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2013 Atlanta semifinal 6-4 4-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 27, 2013* Atlanta ATP 250 SF Hard John Isner #22 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) Lleyton Hewitt #64 Match data
Jul 13, 2013* Newport ATP 250 SF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #64 5-7 6-2 6-4 John Isner #19 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #98 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 John Isner #15 Match data
Jul 15, 2012* Newport ATP 250 F Grass John Isner #11 7-6(1) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #233 Match data
Oct 13, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #23 6-2 6-4 John Isner #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 — — — — — — — 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 — — — — — — — 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —