H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
John Isner vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-0
John Isner holds a 2–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2010 Shanghai Masters second round 4-6 7-6(9) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2010* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 4-6 7-6(9) 7-6(7) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2010* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | John Isner | 6-2 6-3 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| John Isner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |