H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 8-0

John Isner holds a 8–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2016 Washington fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
8 – 0
8 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2016* Washington ATP 500 R16 Hard John Isner #16 7-6(3) 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #41 Match data
Jun 29, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass John Isner #17 7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #40 Match data
Aug 2, 2015* Atlanta ATP 250 F Hard John Isner #19 6-3 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #47 Match data
Aug 3, 2013* Washington ATP 500 QF Hard John Isner #20 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard John Isner #22 7-6(2) 7-6(11) 2-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #59 Match data
Aug 26, 2011* Winston-Salem ATP 250 QF Hard John Isner #28 1-6 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #60 Match data
Aug 10, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #28 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #40 Match data
Jul 31, 2009* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #77 6-3 7-6(11) Marcos Baghdatis #146 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —