H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Isner vs Mardy Fish H2H: 1-3
Mardy Fish holds a 3–1 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 3–0 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2011 Atlanta final 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2011* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Mardy Fish | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | John Isner | Match data |
| May 3, 2011* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | John Isner | 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(3) | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2010* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Mardy Fish | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2009* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Mardy Fish | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |