H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
John Isner holds a 3–1 lead over Marinko Matosevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marinko Matosevic won the 2015 Delray Beach Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marinko Matosevic | 6-4 6-4 | John Isner | Match data | Feb 19, 2015* | R32 | Delray Beach Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| John Isner | 6-3 7-6(1) | Marinko Matosevic | Match data | Aug 13, 2014* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| John Isner | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Marinko Matosevic | Match data | Jul 26, 2014* | QF | Atlanta | ATP 250 | Hard |
| John Isner | 7-6(9) 6-7(5) 7-5 | Marinko Matosevic | Match data | May 7, 2014* | R32 | Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,068 | 470 | 294 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Marinko Matosevic | #509 | #39 | 955 | 1,881 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Marinko Matosevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #203 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,020 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,977 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,984 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,935 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #296 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,028 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,021 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,945 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,925 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,711 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | John Isner | Marinko Matosevic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2007 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2011 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2011 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 2012 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | 2012 | 27 | 12 | 39 | 69.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2013 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2013 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2014 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 29 | 2014 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2015 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2015 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 341 | 206 | 547 | 62.3% | 75 | 59 | 134 | 56.0% | 54 | 29 | 83 | 65.1% | — | 46 | 63 | 109 | 42.2% | 8 | 18 | 26 | 30.8% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 756/764 of John Isner's and 154/155 of Marinko Matosevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | John Isner | Marinko Matosevic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 2007 | 13/13 | 19.6 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 78.2% | 59.4% | 65.5% | 19.8% | 71.9% | 26.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 29/30 | 15.0 | 3.4 | 66.9% | 77.1% | 52.3% | 60.0% | 26.1% | 68.8% | 27.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 45/45 | 14.5 | 2.5 | 67.1% | 75.0% | 57.4% | 65.9% | 29.5% | 69.1% | 30.0% | 2010 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 53.6% | 59.9% | 52.7% | 36.3% | 43.6% | 56.5% | 41.4% |
| 25 | 2010 | 58/58 | 17.8 | 2.3 | 69.1% | 76.5% | 55.9% | 68.0% | 39.3% | 70.1% | 29.9% | 2011 | 11/11 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 63.3% | 44.3% | 41.1% | 36.7% | 55.7% | 34.3% |
| 26 | 2011 | 53/53 | 15.2 | 2.8 | 69.2% | 78.0% | 55.6% | 62.5% | 40.1% | 71.2% | 31.5% | 2012 | 35/35 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 62.5% | 66.5% | 48.9% | 59.9% | 44.6% | 59.9% | 36.3% |
| 27 | 2012 | 56/60 | 16.7 | 2.2 | 67.9% | 78.2% | 57.0% | 72.2% | 33.2% | 71.6% | 31.1% | 2013 | 41/42 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 58.5% | 69.3% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 42.8% | 60.7% | 39.0% |
| 28 | 2013 | 60/60 | 16.3 | 1.7 | 67.7% | 79.4% | 57.8% | 66.5% | 33.7% | 72.2% | 31.1% | 2014 | 44/44 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 70.8% | 48.8% | 61.9% | 39.5% | 61.9% | 37.5% |
| 29 | 2014 | 57/58 | 17.4 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 79.1% | 57.8% | 73.0% | 27.3% | 72.1% | 30.2% | 2015 | 19/19 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 59.0% | 64.0% | 46.4% | 45.9% | 40.1% | 56.1% | 32.2% |
| 30 | 2015 | 68/68 | 18.5 | 1.8 | 70.3% | 80.2% | 58.6% | 74.8% | 37.5% | 73.8% | 29.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 50/50 | 23.2 | 2.7 | 69.2% | 82.4% | 55.3% | 68.3% | 35.9% | 73.9% | 30.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 57/57 | 19.7 | 2.2 | 70.6% | 80.6% | 56.5% | 63.6% | 41.2% | 73.5% | 29.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 54/54 | 22.4 | 2.4 | 69.1% | 81.3% | 56.7% | 70.1% | 30.6% | 73.7% | 29.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 46/46 | 21.8 | 1.7 | 71.0% | 81.4% | 58.6% | 70.1% | 34.2% | 74.7% | 29.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 17/17 | 21.9 | 3.5 | 71.5% | 78.6% | 54.9% | 84.1% | 25.0% | 72.2% | 28.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 33/34 | 20.6 | 2.1 | 68.5% | 79.0% | 55.9% | 62.7% | 34.5% | 71.8% | 28.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 37/38 | 22.6 | 2.8 | 68.8% | 80.3% | 54.1% | 64.9% | 36.6% | 72.1% | 27.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 23/23 | 20.9 | 2.9 | 67.7% | 79.7% | 57.4% | 72.2% | 18.8% | 72.3% | 28.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 756/764 | 18.8 | 2.3 | 68.9% | 79.2% | 56.7% | 68.4% | 33.7% | 72.2% | 29.8% | — | 154/155 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 59.6% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 53.8% | 41.5% | 59.8% | 36.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | John Isner | Marinko Matosevic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 2007 | 1656 | 138.0 | +5.43 | -3.75 | 0.947 | 49.4% | +37 | — | — | 54.1% | -0.19 | 5–1 (83%) | 12–7 (63%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 1608 | 128.0 | +4.14 | -6.69 | 0.881 | 48.3% | +39 | -96 | -116 | 41.0% | -0.51 | 4–8 (33%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | +0.16 | 2009 | 1474 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 1830 | 145.6 | +4.72 | -4.63 | 0.972 | 50.0% | +1 | -280 | — | 57.0% | +0.23 | 12–6 (67%) | 26–12 (68%) | — | +0.93 | 2010 | 1517 | 116.7 | -2.61 | +2.14 | 0.952 | 49.3% | +46 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.60 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.32 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1885 | 154.2 | +5.86 | -4.84 | 1.002 | 50.5% | +41 | -194 | — | 58.8% | +0.34 | 19–9 (68%) | 32–16 (67%) | — | +2.28 | 2011 | 1652 | 121.3 | -4.18 | -1.69 | 0.774 | 45.1% | -10 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.46 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.34 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2020 | 160.4 | +7.13 | -3.98 | 1.097 | 51.5% | +30 | -361 | -297 | 61.6% | +0.53 | 11–11 (50%) | 32–20 (62%) | — | +1.83 | 2012 | 1723 | 139.2 | -2.60 | +0.07 | 0.905 | 48.6% | -9 | -96 | -35 | 41.4% | -0.34 | 10–3 (77%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | +0.84 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1978 | 157.8 | +7.12 | -4.36 | 1.092 | 51.3% | +43 | -260 | -71 | 62.7% | +0.43 | 15–10 (60%) | 38–18 (68%) | — | +3.35 | 2013 | 1794 | 155.0 | -1.62 | +2.21 | 0.992 | 49.7% | +50 | -182 | -171 | 45.7% | -0.30 | 3–9 (25%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.87 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1985 | 159.0 | +7.64 | -3.71 | 1.119 | 51.3% | +52 | -198 | -94 | 59.5% | +0.36 | 18–11 (62%) | 36–17 (68%) | — | +3.48 | 2014 | 1823 | 149.0 | -1.49 | +2.27 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -14 | -180 | -83 | 49.5% | -0.28 | 4–9 (31%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | -4.41 |
| 29 | 2014 | 1935 | 157.9 | +7.20 | -4.42 | 1.079 | 50.8% | +50 | -99 | -27 | 61.8% | +0.44 | 12–6 (67%) | 41–21 (66%) | — | +3.24 | 2015 | 1634 | 127.1 | -5.38 | -1.86 | 0.733 | 44.4% | +99 | -49 | — | 23.9% | -1.65 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.53 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2029 | 168.0 | +8.71 | -4.22 | 1.132 | 51.6% | +54 | -121 | -120 | 62.7% | +0.57 | 12–9 (57%) | 39–25 (61%) | — | +3.80 | 2016 | 1620 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 2021 | 163.0 | +8.76 | -3.60 | 1.179 | 51.8% | +44 | -140 | -79 | 58.6% | +0.48 | 9–10 (47%) | 31–30 (51%) | — | +1.41 | 2017 | 1598 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 1986 | 158.3 | +8.00 | -5.60 | 1.094 | 51.2% | +14 | -91 | -60 | 60.0% | +0.42 | 11–9 (55%) | 40–24 (63%) | — | +3.24 | 2018 | 1583 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 1959 | 158.8 | +8.37 | -4.32 | 1.129 | 51.3% | -23 | -61 | +77 | 57.0% | +0.42 | 14–11 (56%) | 37–32 (54%) | — | +2.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1922 | 154.7 | +8.16 | -3.97 | 1.178 | 51.7% | -6 | — | +115 | 61.2% | +0.47 | 8–7 (53%) | 29–23 (56%) | — | +3.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 1846 | 134.4 | +4.91 | -4.34 | 1.035 | 50.7% | +22 | — | — | 60.9% | +0.50 | 3–3 (50%) | 14–7 (67%) | — | +1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1945 | 152.3 | +6.93 | -5.43 | 1.006 | 50.2% | 0 | +9 | — | 62.5% | +0.27 | 10–5 (67%) | 21–9 (70%) | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 1926 | 145.5 | +6.21 | -5.79 | 0.996 | 49.8% | -21 | +13 | +80 | 55.1% | -0.02 | 11–8 (58%) | 30–17 (64%) | — | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 1711 | 125.8 | +5.40 | -5.66 | 1.012 | 49.9% | +36 | — | +244 | 45.3% | -0.14 | 3–6 (33%) | 11–17 (39%) | — | +1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2068 | 162.0 | +7.10 | -4.58 | 1.071 | 50.9% | +25 | -137 | -39 | 58.7% | +0.34 | 177–130 (58%) | 482–307 (61%) | 111.1 | +4.58 | — | 1882 | 141.4 | -2.48 | +0.96 | 0.917 | 48.5% | +19 | -146 | -100 | 41.4% | -0.57 | 20–27 (43%) | 31–32 (49%) | 97.6 | -3.66 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Anderson | 9 | 4 | 13 | Feb 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 6 | 7 | 13 | Aug 14, 2021 | H2H |
| Juan Martin del Potro | 4 | 8 | 12 | Sep 6, 2018 | H2H |
| Steve Johnson | 5 | 6 | 11 | Apr 8, 2022 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Sep 1, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kei Nishikori | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 27, 2014 | H2H |
| Sam Querrey | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 9, 2015 | H2H |
| John Isner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 19, 2015 | H2H |
| Fernando Verdasco | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 11, 2014 | H2H |