H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 2-2

John Isner and Mikhail Youzhny are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2018 Miami Masters third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 26, 2018* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard John Isner #17 6-4 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #102 Match data
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard John Isner #13 6-3 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #93 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #14 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-4 John Isner #20 Match data
Aug 13, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #65 6-7(8) 6-1 6-3 John Isner #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —