H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Isner vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 3-1
John Isner holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–1 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2012 Newport fourth round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2012* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | John Isner | 6-2 7-6(2) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | John Isner | 7-6(4) 6-2 7-6(6) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | John Isner | 6-4 3-6 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 70-68 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2008* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Nicolas Mahut | 7-5 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |