H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

John Isner vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 3-3

John Isner and Nikolay Davydenko are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #13 7-6(5) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #73 Match data
May 25, 2012* Nice ATP 250 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #53 6-4 7-6(4) John Isner #11 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #10 2-6 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #40 Match data
Oct 9, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard John Isner #22 7-6(2) 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
May 22, 2008* Poertschach ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 John Isner #85 Match data
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 7-6(3) John Isner #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —