H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
John Isner vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 4-4
John Isner and Philipp Kohlschreiber are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 4–3 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2017 Vienna third round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
4
–
4
8 main draw meetings
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 7-6(6) 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2014* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | John Isner | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-4 3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | John Isner | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2012* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| May 15, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | John Isner | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2010* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Philipp Kohlschreiber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 |