H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Isner won the 2015 Atlanta fourth round 7-6(3) 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2015* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #19 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Radek Stepanek #290 Match data
Oct 12, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #41 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 John Isner #12 Match data
Aug 16, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #29 7-5 5-7 7-6(4) John Isner #27 Match data
Jan 20, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard John Isner #20 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-1 Radek Stepanek #66 Match data
Jun 19, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Radek Stepanek #15 6-3 6-2 John Isner #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5