H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Isner vs Steve Johnson H2H: 5-6
Steve Johnson holds a 6–5 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 5–2 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2022 Houston fourth round 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | John Isner | 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-3 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3) | John Isner | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2018* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Steve Johnson | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(5) | John Isner | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2017* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-4 6-4 | John Isner | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2017* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | John Isner | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2016* | Washington | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Steve Johnson | 7-6(7) 7-6(15) | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2015* | Washington | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | John Isner | 6-3 3-6 7-6(9) | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| May 21, 2015* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | John Isner | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2015* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | John Isner | 6-4 6-4 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2014* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6) | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |