H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 3-1

John Isner holds a 3–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2014 Valencia third round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 2014* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #21 7-6(3) 6-3 John Isner #16 Match data
Oct 3, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard John Isner #15 3-6 7-5 7-6(4) Tommy Robredo #21 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay John Isner #11 7-6(13) 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-5 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
Jan 15, 2010* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard John Isner #33 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12