H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

John Isner vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 3-4

Viktor Troicki holds a 4–3 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 3–2 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2017 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2017* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Viktor Troicki #54 6-4 7-6(4) John Isner #16 Match data
Aug 15, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #19 7-6(3) 6-4 Viktor Troicki #47 Match data
Jun 20, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 QF Grass Viktor Troicki #25 7-6(5) 6-3 John Isner #18 Match data
Apr 15, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay John Isner #19 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Viktor Troicki #37 Match data
Aug 11, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Viktor Troicki #15 6-4 3-6 6-2 John Isner #28 Match data
Aug 6, 2011* Washington ATP 500 QF Hard John Isner #35 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 Viktor Troicki #15 Match data
Oct 3, 2009* Bangkok ATP 250 QF Hard Viktor Troicki #32 7-6(3) 6-2 John Isner #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —