H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
John Isner vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 3-0
John Isner holds a 3–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 6-4 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2014* | Auckland | ATP 250 | F | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2011* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | John Isner | 6-1 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| John Isner | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |