H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

John James vs Kim Warwick H2H: 0-2

Kim Warwick holds a 2–0 lead over John James in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1979 Australian Open round of 32 6-3 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John James
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #52 6-3 6-3 6-0 John James #91 Match data Dec 30, 1979* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Kim Warwick #73 6-1 6-3 John James Match data Oct 18, 1979* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John James #808 #81 28 1,682 98 144 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John James Kim Warwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 3–3 50.0% — 1,516 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0
19 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0
21 1972 7–4 63.6% — 1,570 0 0 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0
22 1973 0–5 0.0% — 1,514 0 0 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0
23 1974 2–3 40.0% #249 1,517 0 0 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0
24 1975 5–10 33.3% #135 1,517 0 0 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1
25 1976 6–14 30.0% #146 1,512 0 0 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1
26 1977 16–23 41.0% #97 1,583 0 0 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1
27 1978 20–27 42.6% #102 1,629 0 0 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2
28 1979 19–22 46.3% #91 1,644 0 0 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3
29 1980 12–25 32.4% #209 1,493 0 0 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3
30 1981 3–4 42.9% — 1,490 0 0 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3
31 1982 4–3 57.1% — 1,559 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John James Kim Warwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
19 1970 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
21 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1974 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9%
24 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2%
25 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1978 7 8 15 46.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 32 52 38.5% 24 45 69 34.8% 46 47 93 49.5% 8 20 28 28.6% — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John James Kim Warwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1517 105.8 — — — — — — +24 56.5% +0.69 1–2 (33%) — — +0.22 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42
19 1970 1514 99.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.23 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23
21 1972 1570 111.6 — — — — — — +66 56.7% +0.27 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.69 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
22 1973 1514 96.4 — — — — — — -5 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.23 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10
23 1974 1518 116.6 — — — — — — -4 30.0% -2.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45
24 1975 1517 115.0 — — — — +32 +20 -4 35.3% -1.26 0–2 2–0 — +0.66 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01
25 1976 1513 125.5 — — — — -18 -10 +71 36.0% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.02 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00
26 1977 1583 129.9 — — — — -86 +21 -28 40.0% -0.40 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.34 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65
27 1978 1629 127.4 — — — — -82 -94 +53 43.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.51 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20
28 1979 1645 125.5 — — — — -50 -102 +53 47.9% -0.21 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — +2.00 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21
29 1980 1494 113.3 — — — — +7 +34 +158 34.9% -0.97 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) — +3.49 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26
30 1981 1490 106.2 — — — — +36 — — 50.0% -0.45 0–2 — — +1.40 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50
31 1982 1560 121.8 — — — — — -22 +96 50.0% -0.56 2–0 1–0 — -0.32 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23
Career — 1683 127.2 — — — — -44 -17 +47 42.3% -0.49 21–33 (39%) 20–25 (44%) 94.5 +4.13 — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.